-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[11.0] [MIG] sale_validity #666
Conversation
8e86670
to
95c0ed4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review LGTM
Can you squash a bit commit history avoiding that merge commits? |
7d52af1
to
15d7441
Compare
@pedrobaeza squashed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Can you please check conflicts? Why are you modifying that file? |
@pedrobaeza Done, Here I rebase PR then conflicts error occurs, so I solved it. |
@pedrobaeza @JayVora-SerpentCS Could you please review it and move Forward. |
@murtuzasaleh could you please fix conflicts? |
@lreficent could you please review it? |
@murtuzasaleh that's not the way to solve the conflict (all those "Merge..." commits) you should do a rebase on top of OCA's 11.0 branch. |
0cc59be
to
c14f523
Compare
@lreficent Conflicts solved! Could you please review it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be nice to use new readme format
@murtuzasaleh ping |
c14f523
to
63d53be
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional review ok 👍
@hveficent could you update your review? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
This PR has the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I looked incorrectly to this and it's not creating a new field. I merge.
(../trunk-generic/ rev 1)
Add POT file Add default value duration (in days) for validity per company (ignored if you leave the value to 0, which is the default).
- Update travis.yml to 8.0
* New API * add tests
Convert YAML tests to unittests Add README.rst
f4d57a7
to
70990f7
Compare
Hey @murtuzasaleh, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
Default Quotation Validity
Migration of module Default Quotation Validity v10 to v11.