Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][MIG] mrp_flattened_bom_xlsx_subcontracting_cost: Migration to 16.0 #118

Conversation

PauBForgeFlow
Copy link

@PauBForgeFlow PauBForgeFlow commented Sep 15, 2023

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@BernatPForgeFlow BernatPForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional and code review OK!

@PauBForgeFlow PauBForgeFlow force-pushed the 16.0-mig-mrp_flattened_bom_xlsx_subcontracting_cost branch from 1688ab8 to 787ffd8 Compare October 11, 2023 11:34
@PauBForgeFlow PauBForgeFlow force-pushed the 16.0-mig-mrp_flattened_bom_xlsx_subcontracting_cost branch from 787ffd8 to a2a8d49 Compare October 26, 2023 15:56
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-118-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit a8cbd95 into OCA:16.0 Oct 30, 2023
6 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8a69d85. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow deleted the 16.0-mig-mrp_flattened_bom_xlsx_subcontracting_cost branch October 30, 2023 07:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants