Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10.0][IMP] base_geoengine: allow custom configuration on layer opacity #261

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

lmarion-source
Copy link
Contributor

into the view definition, you can now specify 2 options on the geofield. Opacity (for the layer) and a fill_color
ex:

@lmignon lmignon changed the title [IMP] base_geoengine: allow custom configuration on layer opacity [10.0][IMP] base_geoengine: allow custom configuration on layer opacity Jun 15, 2020
into the view definition, you can now specify 2 options on the geofield. Opacity (for the layer) and a fill_color
ex:
<field name="geofield" widget="geo_edit_map"
 options='{"opacity": 0.4, "fill_color":"#33ccff"}'/>
@lmignon
Copy link
Contributor

lmignon commented Jun 19, 2020

@yvaucher Review welcome... ;-) Can I merge this one?

@yvaucher
Copy link
Member

@lmignon LGTM

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@lmignon
Copy link
Contributor

lmignon commented Jun 23, 2020

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 10.0-ocabot-merge-pr-261-by-lmignon-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@lmignon lmignon mentioned this pull request Jun 23, 2020
2 tasks
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 38b18c8 into OCA:10.0 Jun 23, 2020
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at fb3a02b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@lmignon lmignon deleted the 10.0-layer-opacity branch September 15, 2021 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants