-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
14.0 mig delivery carrier label default #396
Conversation
db1b85f
to
200a99c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Multi Decorator is deprecated in v14, please remove,
the rest looks consistent with the last known version on v11.
I see no differences in the report.render method, so it should work the same.
Approved after decorator removal.
class StockPicking(models.Model): | ||
_inherit = "stock.picking" | ||
|
||
@api.multi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
multi is deprecated in 14.0 remove or will gen error
"license": "AGPL-3", | ||
"installable": True, | ||
"depends": [ | ||
"stock", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
redundant, it is already installed via the dependency chain below:
base_delivery_carrier_label -> delivery_carrier_info -> delivery -> sale_stock ->stock_account -> [ stock ]
…er_label_default as it will uses qweb
Add tests on generating default label
add714c
to
d68f715
Compare
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
@OCA/community-maintainers can someone do a check on this please |
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
@thomaspaulb we are currently using this in our own 14.0 migration its labelled as stale |
@KKamaa Hello, we didn't saw your PR this year (the title was skipping the I compared both migration commits and there are quite some changes between them, I can't say which one is better. What I know is we are using the linked PR above in production for some months now without issues, can you have a look at it please? |
@sonhd91 Can you have a look on this one too? |
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
migration to v14.0, see sample below; it contains default label and generating .csv docs all in one sample.