-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[15.0][MIG] stock_analytic: migration #448
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional LG! Pending to attend comments
@rousseldenis I'm integrated. Migration script's I guess isn't needed because you do that in |
Oops. The good way is to cherry-pick it in order to keep authorship. Can you do it ? And indeed, in your migration commit you can remove migration scripts. |
@rousseldenis I'll wait for your PR merge, because it would be easier for me to cherry pick. |
In order to maintain the data security, I believe that the analytic_account_id field in stock.move.line views needs the analytic group added to it. |
can you include this? #423 |
@AaronHForgeFlow yes, I would do that ASAP. |
@Mantux11 thanks for your effort! Could you please explain why remove _prepare_procurement_values override from stock.move model?
|
Hey @Mantux11, thank you for your Pull Request. It looks like some users haven't signed our Contributor License Agreement, yet.
Appreciation of efforts, |
… Stock analytic XML part is now migrated Add logo for generic modules
- migration point, put all the modules to not installable
This module allows the user to generate analytic information from stock moves. - Fixed flake8 and pylint errors.
Remove sale and purchase dependency. Add test Only assign analytic account if account != valuation acc Changing field name account_analytic_id Adjust to OCA latest guidelines. Add some usahe info on README
Remove remaining encoding hints. Correct lint in test Correct flake8 in test Fix documentation and test_flake8
@AaronHForgeFlow I added all comitt's from 14. @jlzhou Returned this function, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LG!
@AaronHForgeFlow @jlzhou Could you Merge this PR? It's a valid migration, and it hasn't been reviewed for more than a month. |
@Mantux11 This needs an additional approval for the merge. Perhaps you can ping the people that have commented here but did not do a formal review. |
/ocabot migration stock_analytic |
I don't use this module. Ping my in 2 week if it not reviewed by other contributors. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing coverage for one method. Otherwise, we've been using a previous version of this PR, identical but without this method, and we've been doing so for 2 or 3 months now and it's working fine. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! I was trying to do a functional review in runboat and even though the analytic modules were installed, I was not able to allow analytic funcionalities even in the accounting app. Can you help me with that? Thanks in advance!
@florenciafrigieri2 It's been a long time ago, when I tested this module, so personally, I forgot. If I will find, how and where, I will update this comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100% code coverage, and working well. It's good to go!
This PR has the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM technical review
@rafaelbn passed 2 weeks and PR has been approved. Could you review it and merge? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review
@OCA/accounting-maintainers
/ocabot merge nobump |
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 1b17ae2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Migration to
15.0
.product
file was deleted, because in original odoo 14 code_anglo_saxon_sale_move_lines
function was deleted. I don't know why this was left in14.0
migration, but I say that, if no one had problems, I don't see any issues that is associated with this, so I assume that this is not necessary to leave a file that don't do anything. Improved tests.