Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an initial draft for a proposal for an 'archetype' field for paths. #3369

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

myronww
Copy link

@myronww myronww commented Sep 14, 2023

This is an initial draft for a proposal for adding an 'archetype' field to the specification for paths. I am adding a PR for this initial draft so I can get feedback on the proposal.

@myronww myronww changed the title Add an initial draft for a proposal for an 'archetype' field for path. Add an initial draft for a proposal for an 'archetype' field for paths. Sep 14, 2023
@karenetheridge
Copy link
Member

There's too many issues and PRs all discussing this proposal; where is the canonical location for that? And can the other locations be closed?

@myronww
Copy link
Author

myronww commented Sep 25, 2023

There's too many issues and PRs all discussing this proposal; where is the canonical location for that? And can the other locations be closed?

So, can you refer me to some of the other issues and proposals, or provide some relevant search terms. Can you provide a list of specific actions items that your requesting in order to make progress.

@myronww
Copy link
Author

myronww commented Sep 29, 2023

Here are links to other issues open on this that are related. Here is the open issue that I opened for this.

OAI/sig-moonwalk#77

Here are some past issues that look to be related.

#577
#576

@myronww
Copy link
Author

myronww commented Sep 29, 2023

There's too many issues and PRs all discussing this proposal; where is the canonical location for that? And can the other locations be closed?

If you know of any other issues that are related that i should like or any search terms i could use to find related issues, that would be great.

@handrews
Copy link
Member

Filed #3257 to revive and clarify our proposals process. Once we figure it out, we'll resolve this PR accordingly.

@handrews
Copy link
Member

In today's TDC call we closed a different proposal PR (#2582) because it is being discussed in Moonwalk, and that discussion has a link to the PR. Features added to Moonwalk are all being considered for backporting / adaptation to 3.x, so there is no need to track things seprately here.

The Moonwalk discussion for this idea is:

Which contains the proposal text from this PR, and has already attracted more comments than there are here. Therefore I'm going to close this in favor of the discussion.

@handrews handrews closed this Feb 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants