-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #4154 from handrews/dev-reorg
Describe new spec branch and file layout
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
106 additions
and
18 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -37,18 +37,19 @@ Looking to see how you can create your own OpenAPI definition, present it, or ot | |
## Participation | ||
|
||
The current process for developing the OpenAPI Specification is described in | ||
[Development Guidelines](DEVELOPMENT.md). | ||
the [Contributing Guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md). | ||
|
||
Developing the next version of the OpenAPI Specification is guided by the [Technical Steering Committee (TSC)](https://www.openapis.org/participate/how-to-contribute/governance#TDC). This group of committers bring their API expertise, incorporate feedback from the community, and expand the group of committers as appropriate. All development activity on the future specification will be performed as features and merged into this branch. Upon release of the future specification, this branch will be merged to `main`. | ||
|
||
The TSC holds weekly web conferences to review open pull requests and discuss open issues related to the evolving OpenAPI Specification. Participation in weekly calls and scheduled working sessions is open to the community. You can view the entire OpenAPI [technical meeting calendar](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/[email protected]) online. | ||
|
||
The OpenAPI Initiative encourages participation from individuals and companies alike. If you want to participate in the evolution of the OpenAPI Specification, consider taking the following actions: | ||
|
||
* Review the [current specification](versions/3.1.0.md). The human-readable markdown file _is the source of truth_ for the specification. | ||
* Review the [development](DEVELOPMENT.md) process so you understand how the spec is evolving. | ||
* Check the [issues](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues) and [pull requests](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/pulls) to see if someone has already documented your idea or feedback on the specification. You can follow an existing conversation by subscribing to the existing issue or PR. | ||
* Review the [current specification](https://spec.openapis.org) on the official specification site, which is the source of truth as it includes the full credits and citations. | ||
* Review the [contributing](CONTRIBUTING.md) process so you understand how the spec is evolving. | ||
* Check the [discussions](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/discussions), [issues](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues) and [pull requests](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/pulls) to see if someone has already documented your idea or feedback on the specification. You can follow an existing conversation by subscribing to the existing issue or PR. | ||
* Subscribe to an open issue a day (or a week) in your inbox via [CodeTriage.com](https://www.codetriage.com/oai/openapi-specification). | ||
* Create an issue to describe a new concern. If possible, propose a solution. | ||
* Create a discussion to describe a new concern, ideally with clear explanations of related use cases. | ||
|
||
Not all feedback can be accommodated, and there may be solid arguments for or against a change being appropriate for the specification. | ||
|
||
|