-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix error handling in Stream::getContents() #252
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand how setting an error handler fixes this issue when other tools and even Guzzle check for a
false
return. Nothing about this code seems like it will actually solve the issue, because the return value ofstream_get_contents
is not being checked.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When stream_get_contents returns false, it first always triggers a PHP warning. Since we catch those in the error handler, the function will never really return false.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Considering that such behavior is not documented, why take that approach over checking the return value is false? Every other fix I've looked at around this issue is doing a
$ret === false
check...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would be dead code. Many things are not documented, especially regarding error handling. Returning false always means an error, and PHP has to trigger a warning to tell about the error so this is still solid IMHO. Of course, feel free to add the check on your side if you're not comfortable with the logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you saying that checking
=== false
does not work, or are you saying that this monkey patching with the error handler identifies the impendingreturn false
more quickly?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a question to understand this patch a little better.
Why do you declare an "$exception" variable for the Exception although the catch block gets the same Exception instance? Is there some PHP specific logic / behavior behind this (that is not documented)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we remove this check, we would always wrap the exception thrown in the error handler in another exception. This check allows removing this needless wrapping exception.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, thanks. Then my next question is, why not move the
set_error_handler
into the try-block to handle that (scope) in the same place?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if set_error_handler fails for any reasons, we don't want restore_error_handler to be called
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And in PHP, try/catch does not create a scope anyway.