Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

airwave: fix VST SDK and Qt plugins #82380

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

egasimus
Copy link
Contributor

@egasimus egasimus commented Mar 12, 2020

Motivation for this change
  • VST SDK 3.6.8 (vstsdk368_08_11_2017_build_121.zip) has fallen off the Internet.
  • VST SDK 3.6.14 (vst-sdk_3.6.14_build-24_2019-11-29.zip) can be automatically downloaded from Steinberg's servers or from GitHub but does not contain the required VST2 SDK headers.
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

* The currently required version (`vstsdk368_08_11_2017_build_121.zip`) seems to have fallen off the Internet.
* The latest version (`vst-sdk_3.6.14_build-24_2019-11-29.zip`) can be automatically downloaded from Steinberg's servers, however it does not contain the VST2 SDK headers needed by Airwave.
* I've raised an issue on the [Steinberg VST SDK GitHub](steinbergmedia/vst3sdk#51) to make the VST2 SDK easily available.
* In the meantime, I propose this fix. It's the only way I've managed to build Airwave from nixpkgs; caveat, I am yet to test it with any real Windows VSTs.
* Replacing `multiStdenv.mkDerivation` with `qt5.makeDerivation` is not an option, making this one out of 2 derivations in nixpkgs to depend on `multiStdenv`.
* However, adding `qt5.wrapQtAppsHook` to `nativeBuildInputs` is enough for the derivation to build; the resulting `airwave-manager` binary finds its runtime dependencies successfully.
* Next: let's try bridging an actual plugin.
@egasimus egasimus changed the title Patch 1 airwave: fix VST SDK and Qt plugins Mar 12, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux labels Mar 12, 2020
@worldofpeace
Copy link
Contributor

Also added qt5.wrapQtAppsHook into nativeBuildInputs as per #65399 (qt5.mkDerivation is not an option because of multiStdenv.mkDerivation - but hey, now it builds and runs!)

You can do mkDerivationWith multiStdenv.mkDerivation

@@ -42,7 +41,7 @@ multiStdenv.mkDerivation {

src = airwave-src;

nativeBuildInputs = [ cmake makeWrapper ];
nativeBuildInputs = [ cmake makeWrapper qt5.wrapQtAppsHook ];

buildInputs = [ file libX11 qt5.qtbase wine-xembed ];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should never reference qt5 directly, and instead should use the libsForQt5.callPackage function to bring all attributes within qt5 into scope.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 20, 2020

Hello, I'm a bot and I thank you in the name of the community for your contributions.

Nixpkgs is a busy repository, and unfortunately sometimes PRs get left behind for too long. Nevertheless, we'd like to help committers reach the PRs that are still important. This PR has had no activity for 180 days, and so I marked it as stale, but you can rest assured it will never be closed by a non-human.

If this is still important to you and you'd like to remove the stale label, we ask that you leave a comment. Your comment can be as simple as "still important to me". But there's a bit more you can do:

If you received an approval by an unprivileged maintainer and you are just waiting for a merge, you can @ mention someone with merge permissions and ask them to help. You might be able to find someone relevant by using Git blame on the relevant files, or via GitHub's web interface. You can see if someone's a member of the nixpkgs-committers team, by hovering with the mouse over their username on the web interface, or by searching them directly on the list.

If your PR wasn't reviewed at all, it might help to find someone who's perhaps a user of the package or module you are changing, or alternatively, ask once more for a review by the maintainer of the package/module this is about. If you don't know any, you can use Git blame on the relevant files, or GitHub's web interface to find someone who touched the relevant files in the past.

If your PR has had reviews and nevertheless got stale, make sure you've responded to all of the reviewer's requests / questions. Usually when PR authors show responsibility and dedication, reviewers (privileged or not) show dedication as well. If you've pushed a change, it's possible the reviewer wasn't notified about your push via email, so you can always officially request them for a review, or just @ mention them and say you've addressed their comments.

Lastly, you can always ask for help at our Discourse Forum, or more specifically, at this thread or at #nixos' IRC channel.

@stale stale bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Sep 20, 2020
@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Closing due to inactivity. Feel free to reopen the discussion.

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jan 18, 2021
@Janik-Haag Janik-Haag added the 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle! label Jun 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux 12. first-time contribution This PR is the author's first one; please be gentle!
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants