Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[wip] Statically built Nix #56281
[wip] Statically built Nix #56281
Changes from 11 commits
b5c6080
9b92e6e
a44937b
d932883
3cb7e9f
634b049
f1a5fb8
350f3d0
78bd45b
f2290fb
dccd9e3
3afa626
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is temporary I assume?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe... binutils and musl seemed to get stuck. I don't think anyone supports i686 very well any more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that combination or in isolation?
with targetPlatform.isx86_32 && targetPlatform.isMusl
I'd be more comfortable with that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see #62817
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this still needed? It was explicitly removed in a recent-ish PR with the idea that this didn't hurt but didn't help, IIRC. Might be good to check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem right, why must this be disabled for static adapter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah maybe not... I was getting an issue that I thought was due to this but it might have been unrelated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would imagine your target audience for this is users who are running and deploying on rootless "enterprise" environments such a RHEL or CentOS. It's worth noting that in many of these setups, kerberos is used extensively for all HTTP and git authentication, so if you could get it working in this static variant it'd probably be worthwhile.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah this is an issue. libkrb5 doesn't have good way to link statically, however:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439039
kerberos heimdal might support it though.