aerospace: 0.14.2-Beta -> 0.15.2-Beta

[DavSanchez]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[alexandru0-dev]

I've just noticed I've committed a little mistake in my original PR
the hash isn't correctly checked as i've used hash instead of sha256
could you replace the hash line with:

sha256 = "sha256-jOSUtVSiy/S4nsgvfZZqZjxsppqNi90edn8rcTa+pFQ=";

(the sha256 is already updated for the 0.15.2-Beta)
thxx

[DavSanchez]

Oops! Thanks for the heads up, I didn’t notice it either. Fixed! :)

[Scrumplex]

the hash isn't correctly checked as i've used hash instead of sha256

That's odd. From what I can tell, hash seems to be preferred nowadays, as the SRI hash (sha256-...) includes the type already.

[alexandru0-dev]

Yeah but idk using fetchZip the hash isn't checked apparently

[Scrumplex]

This might be a problem with impure Nix. I don't really think this is too much of a blocker anyway.

[Scrumplex]

Changes LGTM. Source hash is correct