Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
monero-cli: update submodule version; disable aarch64-darwin #341980
monero-cli: update submodule version; disable aarch64-darwin #341980
Changes from all commits
c2ec210
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Setting badPlatforms when platforms does not include it, is redundant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks; I wasn't sure about that. I was following the advice from an earlier review of this PR: #341980 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@philipmw only now I noticed, that you change from
platforms.all
toplatforms.linux
I think the best would be to change to
platform.unix
for both monero-cli and monero-gui - can you please send a PR to set this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@prusnak, I don't have any environment besides Linux and macOS to test, so I don't think it would be right for me to advertise a capability that I cannot validate. Can you validate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@philipmw ok, use linux and darwin instead of unix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, can you clarify what you are asking me to change? Right now the list of supported platforms is
linux
and notdarwin
becauseaarch64-darwin
is broken for me. I don't see a way to improve on this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is still x86_64-darwin
Your earlier change is a regression because now the package is not available for this platform
I suggest to change the platforms to [ linux darwin ] for both monero-cli and monero-gui.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, @prusnak. I do have an Intel-based MacBook Pro I can test with, so I tried
nix-build -A monero-cli
tonight on master. Unfortunately the build is failing:I rewound the repo to the commit before my change (97b33aa) and tried building that. That fails also, though with a different error:
So, I think not including "darwin" is not a regression, since it didn't use to build anyway... and since it still doesn't build, it's still fine to not include it. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK