Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkgs/development: remove unused arguments #331886

Merged

Conversation

Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member

@Sigmanificient Sigmanificient commented Aug 3, 2024

Description of changes

A lot of progress has been made and over 2000 unused args of them were removed!
With previous bits, ocaml & python packages cleaned-up, there is few enough to to a whole pass on pkgs/development.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@Sigmanificient Sigmanificient force-pushed the remove-unused-arguments-pkgs-dev branch from acbf14a to 63d05d9 Compare August 3, 2024 15:18
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin label Aug 3, 2024
@Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member Author

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 331886 run on x86_64-linux 1

Copy link
Member

@RossComputerGuy RossComputerGuy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LLVM side looks good

Copy link
Contributor

@corngood corngood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dotnet looks good. thanks!

Copy link
Member

@winterqt winterqt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rust side looks good.

Copy link
Contributor

@drupol drupol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PHP: all good.

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more reputable people label Aug 3, 2024
@Aleksanaa Aleksanaa merged commit 33309eb into NixOS:master Aug 4, 2024
25 checks passed
@trofi
Copy link
Contributor

trofi commented Aug 6, 2024

63d05d9 pkgs/development: remove unused arguments brpke the eval of octave.buildEnv in `master. Proposed the possible fix as:

@Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member Author

Sigmanificient commented Aug 6, 2024

Oh no! I'm sorry for this, I hope this gets merge rapidly

@drupol
Copy link
Contributor

drupol commented Aug 6, 2024

Done ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: dotnet Language: .NET 6.topic: erlang 6.topic: golang 6.topic: haskell 6.topic: llvm/clang Issues related to llvmPackages, clangStdenv and related 6.topic: lua 6.topic: nodejs 6.topic: ocaml 6.topic: php 6.topic: python 6.topic: qt/kde 6.topic: ruby 6.topic: rust 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Linux 12.approvals: 3+ This PR was reviewed and approved by three or more reputable people
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants