Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

greetd.dlm: correct cargo dependencies #324316

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Aleksanaa
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

The cargoSha256 is actually wrong as Cargo.lock contains git dependencies.

This is found when dealing with the rest of #323983.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

The cargoSha256 is actually wrong as Cargo.lock contains git
dependencies.
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from luc65r July 3, 2024 13:17
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 labels Jul 3, 2024
@Aleksanaa Aleksanaa closed this Jul 14, 2024
Aleksanaa added a commit to Aleksanaa/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
I found this package while cleaning cargoSha256. Its cargoSha256 was
actually wrong and included git dependencies, but it has never been
corrected. I tried fixing it in
NixOS#324316 and requested a maintainer
review, but the maintainer didn't respond to me for the next two weeks.
Upstream was last updated four years ago. Considering we now have much
better login managers for greetd, we should no longer need this package.
@Aleksanaa Aleksanaa mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2024
13 tasks
shahinism pushed a commit to shahinism/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
I found this package while cleaning cargoSha256. Its cargoSha256 was
actually wrong and included git dependencies, but it has never been
corrected. I tried fixing it in
NixOS#324316 and requested a maintainer
review, but the maintainer didn't respond to me for the next two weeks.
Upstream was last updated four years ago. Considering we now have much
better login managers for greetd, we should no longer need this package.
mindstorms6 pushed a commit to mindstorms6/nixpkgs that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
I found this package while cleaning cargoSha256. Its cargoSha256 was
actually wrong and included git dependencies, but it has never been
corrected. I tried fixing it in
NixOS#324316 and requested a maintainer
review, but the maintainer didn't respond to me for the next two weeks.
Upstream was last updated four years ago. Considering we now have much
better login managers for greetd, we should no longer need this package.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant