gerbolyze: init at v3.1.7, gerbonara: init at v1.2.0

[Wulfsta]

Description of changes

Add Gerbolyze and its dependencies. Thanks to @ghpzin for the help with svg-flatten.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[jtbx]

Looks good 👍

[pbsds]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 286368 run on x86_64-linux 1

4 packages built:

• gerbolyze
• gerbolyze.dist
• python311Packages.gerbonara
• python311Packages.gerbonara.dist

LGTM for the most part, just some nits.

Would it make sense to split of svg-flatten into a separate package? If so consider moving its definition to a separate folder in by-name and inherit (gerbolyze) version src;

[Wulfsta]

Would it make sense to split of svg-flatten into a separate package? If so consider moving its definition to a separate folder in by-name and inherit (gerbolyze) version src;

I don't think svg-flatten should be a separate package. It seems a handful of projects exist with this name, and Gerbolyze seems to be the only one that uses this piece of code. I had initially split it off, but decided to do it this way after some consideration.

[pbsds]

ofborg darwin is unhappy, consider marking it broken on darwin

[Wulfsta]

I don't see a reason that svg-flatten shouldn't be able to build on darwin, let me see if I can fix it by twiddling with the build flags...

Couldn't get it working on darwin, making it linux specific.