Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

highs: init at 1.6.0 #273289

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

highs: init at 1.6.0 #273289

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

david-r-cox
Copy link
Member

@david-r-cox david-r-cox commented Dec 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@david-r-cox david-r-cox marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2023 08:04
@quantenzitrone
Copy link
Contributor

quantenzitrone commented Dec 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

You need to add yourself to maintainers/maintainer-list.nix (in a separate commit).

@david-r-cox
Copy link
Member Author

You need to add yourself to maintainers/maintainer-list.nix (in a separate commit).

Thanks @quantenzitrone -- I updated maintainer-list.nix in #273252 and will wait for that to merge before running nixpkgs-review.

eclairevoyant
eclairevoyant suggested changes Dec 11, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@eclairevoyant eclairevoyant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as the maintainer commit, can you rebase this branch to come off 6290195 where you added yourself to maintainers? That way you're not really duplicating work, but ofborg can eval it.

pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@david-r-cox david-r-cox marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2023 05:06
@david-r-cox david-r-cox marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2023 05:07
@david-r-cox
Copy link
Member Author

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 273289 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • highs

eclairevoyant
eclairevoyant suggested changes Dec 12, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@eclairevoyant eclairevoyant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One more bit of feedback, but otherwise tested out on my end, seems good

pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
@david-r-cox
Copy link
Member Author

@eclairevoyant is there anything else that I should be doing on this PR? This (along with #273296, #273295, and #273252) is my first time contributing to nixpkgs. Thanks again for the review.

@eclairevoyant
Copy link
Contributor

I approved but I don't have access to merge

eclairevoyant
eclairevoyant reviewed Feb 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
pkgs/by-name/hi/highs/package.nix
homepage = "https://www.highs.dev";
license = with licenses; [ mit ];
maintainers = with maintainers; [ david-r-cox ];
mainProgram = "highs";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the CI again - do you know why the tests are failing on darwin?

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Contributor

looks like #295386 already got merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eclairevoyant eclairevoyant eclairevoyant approved these changes

@quantenzitrone quantenzitrone quantenzitrone approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2.status: merge conflict 8.has: package (new) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1 11.by: package-maintainer 12.approvals: 1 needs_merger
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@david-r-cox @quantenzitrone @eclairevoyant @KiaraGrouwstra @delroth @wolfgangwalther @wegank