python310Packages.etils: init at 0.6.0

[mcwitt]

Description of changes

Adds https://github.com/google/etils.

Initial motivation is that this is a dependency of jax>=0.3.14. This is a dependency of #183051.

Note: the derivation was contributed by @mweinelt (commit)

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[SuperSandro2000]

@ofborg build python310Packages.etils

[SuperSandro2000]

tests are failing. Please fix them.

[mcwitt]

tests are failing. Please fix them.

I think this is because jax is currently broken on master: #183173. I can bump this when the jax issue is resolved.

[samuela]

Just merged #185078 to fix jax. If you rebase on top of that I think you should be good to go now!

[SuperSandro2000]

@ofborg build python310Packages.etils

[SuperSandro2000]

Fails to build because tensorflow fails to build.

[mcwitt]

Fails to build because tensorflow fails to build.

Opened #185273

[samuela]

Maybe we should just merge this with tests disabled to unblock this PR, and then come back and re-enable tests once tensorflow is fixed?

[mcwitt]

Maybe we should just merge this with tests disabled to unblock this PR, and then come back and re-enable tests once tensorflow is fixed?

@samuela that sounds good to me. I went ahead and pushed a version with the tests disabled in case we decide to go ahead and merge.

[samuela]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 183052 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built:

• python310Packages.etils
• python39Packages.etils

[samuela]

Thanks @mcwitt ! This should help unblock us with the JAX upgrade and then we can come back and re-enable tests once that becomes possible