Update commission_test.go

[volosianko77]

1. Combined the import statements.
2. Moved the definition of the nextAnteHandler function outside of the loop for clarity.
3. Simplified the commissionRate initialization.
4. Removed unnecessary pointer creation for messages.
5. Simplified the creation of sad messages within the createSadMsgs function.
6. Removed redundant type conversions.
7. Used the sdk.NewDecWithPrec constructor directly for commission rate initialization.
8. Used pointer literals directly for creating sad messages.
9. Cleaned up the main test logic by simplifying the message construction and error handling.

Purpose / Abstract

• Closes #AAA

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Enhanced the test suite for the AnteDecoratorStakingCommission function to improve clarity and efficiency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent update focuses on refining the testing approach for the AnteDecoratorStakingCommission functionality within the application. By redefining auxiliary components, updating key definitions, and enhancing message structures, the changes aim to bolster both the clarity and the efficiency of the test suite. This streamlined approach ensures that the functionality is thoroughly and effectively validated, contributing to the overall robustness of the application.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
app/ante/.../commission_test.go	Refactored tests for AnteDecoratorStakingCommission, including updates to handlers, commission rates, message structures, and test cases refinement.

🐇✨
Changes abound, in tests they're found,
With code so neat, and bugs to beat.
A rabbit hops, through lines it bops,
Refining code, in its humble abode.
🚀🌟

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbdf02d and 29e2f88.

Files selected for processing (1)

• app/ante/commission_test.go (3 hunks)

Additional comments: 8

app/ante/commission_test.go (8)

• 6-6: Streamlining import statements improves readability and maintainability by reducing clutter. Good job on consolidating the imports.
• 16-16: Moving the nextAnteHandler function definition outside of a loop enhances clarity and makes the test flow easier to understand. This is a positive change for maintainability.
• 23-23: The mock description for testing is well-defined and contributes to the readability of the test cases by providing clear, mock data.
• 36-36: Utilizing sdk.NewDecWithPrec directly for initializing commissionRate simplifies the code and makes it more expressive. This is a good practice for clarity and conciseness.
• 38-52: Refining the creation of happy messages by directly using constructors and simplifying the syntax improves readability and maintainability. However, ensure that the removal of unnecessary pointer creation (as mentioned in the PR objectives) does not affect the intended behavior of the test cases.
• 56-67: Simplifying the creation of "sad messages" within the createSadMsgs function contributes to the efficiency and readability of the test code. Directly manipulating the message structures for test cases is a good practice. However, ensure that these changes accurately reflect the intended test scenarios.
• 72-72: The test cases are well-structured and cover both "happy" and "sad" scenarios. This structure enhances the test suite's clarity and ensures comprehensive testing. Good job on organizing the test cases.
• 115-115: The use of the tx.Factory{} for building unsigned transactions within the test cases is a good practice. It ensures that the test setup is clear and aligns with the actual transaction creation process. However, ensure that the transaction builder is correctly configured for all test scenarios.