Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add all patch clamp types to latest icephys tutorial #2004

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

bendichter
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

I found that 3 of the patch clamp types were missing from our most recent icephys tutorial

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.88%. Comparing base (7087f00) to head (d177672).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #2004   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.88%   91.88%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2711     2711           
  Branches      707      707           
=======================================
  Hits         2491     2491           
  Misses        144      144           
  Partials       76       76           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 72.85% <ø> (ø)
unit 82.84% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@ehennestad
Copy link

@bendichter Should the types also be added to the file?

@bendichter bendichter enabled auto-merge (squash) November 25, 2024 15:47
@bendichter bendichter merged commit a63387d into dev Nov 25, 2024
25 checks passed
@bendichter bendichter deleted the tut-icephys-add-patch-clamp-type-classes branch November 25, 2024 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants