You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Raw sequencing reads: segments with >1000 raw reads are removed.
in fact in the code (NanoStringGeoMxSet-qc.R), it works as:
lowReads <- sData(object)["Raw"] < cutoff
This looks correct in code (fewer raw reads than cutoff was labeled) but incorrect in the document (more raw reads than cutoff was removed).
Similarly (but reversely), the document mentioned:
segments with low negative counts (1-10) are not necessarily removed
Thank you for contacting us about our tools! To receive assistance, kindly email [email protected] with detailed information about your issue. If applicable, attach a screenshot of any encountered errors and include a copy of the modified script in Notepad. Our customer support team will help facilitate a review and resolution of the issue.
Thank you for choosing NanoString,
NanoString Dev Team
Hello,
Can someone help me to understand the QC process?
Based on this link:
https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/workflows/vignettes/GeoMxWorkflows/inst/doc/GeomxTools_RNA-NGS_Analysis.html#4_QC__Pre-processing
It mentioned:
in fact in the code (NanoStringGeoMxSet-qc.R), it works as:
lowReads <- sData(object)["Raw"] < cutoff
This looks correct in code (fewer raw reads than cutoff was labeled) but incorrect in the document (more raw reads than cutoff was removed).
Similarly (but reversely), the document mentioned:
But in the code, it works as:
This looks incorrect in code (fewer negative counts than cutoff was labeled) but correct in the document (more negative counts should be labeled).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: