NanoComp · stevengj · Apr 12, 2022 · Mar 31, 2022 · Mar 31, 2022 · Mar 31, 2022
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/README.md b/Metagrating3D/README.md
@@ -30,7 +30,12 @@ As an example, optimized metagrating designs with following parameters can be fo
 - **Period**: Px = 1050/sin(50) nm, Py = 0.5* 1050 nm
 - **Thickness**: 325 nm
 - **Polarization**: TE and TM
-- **Unit Cell**: Nx = 118, Ny = 45
+- **Unit Cell**: Nx = 472, Ny = 180
 
-The deflection efficiencies for the example device in this repo are, TE: 95.14%, TM: 91.14%. `device.mat` file contains all optimization parameters and final device pattern in matlab format while `device.csv` is the optimized device pattern (2D matrix) in csv format. 
+The deflection efficiencies for the example device in this repo are:
+- **Device1**: TE 86%, TM 89%
+- **Device2**: TE 89%, TM 88%
+- **Device3**: TE 89%, TM 90%
+
+`device.mat` file contains all optimization parameters and final device pattern in matlab format while `device.csv` is the optimized device pattern (2D matrix) in csv format. 
 
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device1.csv b/Metagrating3D/device1.csv
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device1.mat b/Metagrating3D/device1.mat
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device2.csv b/Metagrating3D/device2.csv
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device2.mat b/Metagrating3D/device2.mat
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device3.csv b/Metagrating3D/device3.csv
diff --git a/Metagrating3D/device3.mat b/Metagrating3D/device3.mat