Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite Discord group sync to use v5 Nameless-Link API #3222

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 28, 2023

Conversation

tadhgboyle
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle added the bug label Jan 22, 2023
@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle added this to the 2.0.x milestone Jan 22, 2023
@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle self-assigned this Jan 22, 2023
@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2023 02:48
@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle force-pushed the fix/discord-group-sync-batching branch 2 times, most recently from 0216558 to 35b7f5f Compare January 26, 2023 17:56
@Derkades Derkades modified the milestones: 2.0.x, 2.1.0 Jan 27, 2023
@tadhgboyle tadhgboyle force-pushed the fix/discord-group-sync-batching branch from 6f62b8e to 9783c85 Compare January 28, 2023 01:01
Derkades
Derkades previously approved these changes Jan 28, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Derkades Derkades left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've requested my review but I don't know enough about NamelessMC to review this code.

I will say I am happy with the current API, from the perspective of Nameless-Plugin and Nameless-Link. And you tested it and it worked, so that's a good sign (although all previous group sync system iterations also appeared to work)

You will need a second approval anyway, after undoing 2.1.0 line :P

@Derkades Derkades merged commit 60a7cef into develop Jan 28, 2023
@Derkades Derkades deleted the fix/discord-group-sync-batching branch January 28, 2023 18:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants