Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timestamp issue, cleanup, other small improvements #12

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JGoodrichBNL
Copy link
Collaborator

A bunch of changes, including the timestamp fixes from @josephhanrahan and @genematx, small optimizations of the clustering/centroiding, removing Databroker/CHX ophyd object-specific code, and other various cleanups and improvements.

We will likely use this code in our upcoming experiments (Aug 1st - Aug 4th), regardless if the PR is accepted, unless a major issue is discovered.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
{

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's great to have a few examples like this, however committing output cells of a notebook to a git repo is generally considered bad practice. We already have a tool, nbstripout, for cleaning up the notebooks before committing them. It can be activated as a pre-commit hook. Before committing, simply run pre-commit run --all (or pick a specific file) -- it will do some formatting, linting, and make sure the the code conforms to the stylistic standards.

@genematx
Copy link

@JGoodrichBNL could you please make this PR into my working branch, genematx/toa-issue, instead of main? In case you can't (maybe some missing permissions), I'll just merge it myself.

@genematx
Copy link

Merged these changes into PR #10. This PR can be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants