Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add code to job/ app to accept Hot & Cold Thermal Storage #357

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Dec 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator

@zolanaj zolanaj commented Sep 6, 2022

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • CHANGELOG.md is updated
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Update job/ app to include HotThermalStorage, ColdThermalStorage code

Addresses issue #298 and issue #373

@zolanaj zolanaj added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 6, 2022
@zolanaj zolanaj changed the title Add code to job/ app to accept Hot Thermal Storage Add code to job/ app to accept Hot & Cold Thermal Storage Nov 11, 2022
@zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zolanaj commented Dec 21, 2022

@Bill-Becker this PR adds both hot and cold TES functionality to the API. I added TES to the new test we added for the CoolingLoad PR. Let me know if you have any questions - thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@Bill-Becker Bill-Becker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This all looks good to me, thanks! There is an open PR that adds a test for all inputs of the API to check for consistency with REopt.jl, so all new inputs should be added to that. I know that a lot of other inputs have been added without being added to that, so maybe it's fine to leave off these new inputs off for now and we'll have to go through after that PR passes and add everything.

@zolanaj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zolanaj commented Dec 28, 2022

Thanks @Bill-Becker! I'll make a note of this but given there are other inputs to be merged, I won't add an issue right now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants