Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use correct array index in IntraZoneNodeData #8796

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

lgu1234
Copy link
Contributor

@lgu1234 lgu1234 commented Jun 2, 2021

Pull request overview

The index of ZoneNum used in IntraZoneNodeData array is replaced by AFNZoneNum. The program runs completion.

A test file is uploaded.

NOTE: ENHANCEMENTS MUST FOLLOW A SUBMISSION PROCESS INCLUDING A FEATURE PROPOSAL AND DESIGN DOCUMENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTING CODE

Pull Request Author

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • [ X] Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • [X ] Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • [X ] Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • [X ] Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@lgu1234 lgu1234 added the Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus label Jun 2, 2021
ShowSevereError(
state,
RoutineName + CurrentModuleObject + "='" + Alphas(1) + ": Invalid zone inputs between Node and Link " + Alphas(2) +
" and " +
state.dataAirflowNetwork
->MultizoneZoneData(
state.dataAirflowNetwork->IntraZoneNodeData(state.dataAirflowNetwork->IntraZoneLinkageData(i).NodeNums[0])
.ZoneNum)
.AFNZoneNum)
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct array index is used.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@lgu1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

lgu1234 commented Jun 2, 2021

@LipingWang The fix is uploaded.

@nrel-bot
Copy link

nrel-bot commented Jul 1, 2021

@lgu1234 @lgentile it has been 28 days since this pull request was last updated.

ShowSevereError(
state,
RoutineName + CurrentModuleObject + "='" + Alphas(1) + ": Invalid zone inputs between Node and Link " + Alphas(2) +
" and " +
state.dataAirflowNetwork
->MultizoneZoneData(
state.dataAirflowNetwork->IntraZoneNodeData(state.dataAirflowNetwork->IntraZoneLinkageData(i).NodeNums[0])
.ZoneNum)
.AFNZoneNum)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@Myoldmopar
Copy link
Member

Pulled develop in just to make sure nothing broke with recent changes. Everything built and ran fine. Merging this. Thanks @lgu1234 for the fix and @jasondegraw for the review.

@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar merged commit 5394050 into develop Jul 15, 2021
@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar deleted the Issue8735-AFN-Bad-allocation-error branch July 15, 2021 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants