Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Niad-3102: test dlq redelivery behaviour #648

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

ole4ryb
Copy link
Contributor

@ole4ryb ole4ryb commented Jun 24, 2024

What

Test is placed to confirm that DLQ redelivery mechanism is working as expected.

Why

We need to be sure that in case of any exceptional scenario a message will be delivered to DLQ.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Internal change (non-breaking change with no effect on the functionality affecting end users)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have updated the Changelog with details of my change in the UNRELEASED section if this change will affect end users
  • A corresponding change has been made to the Mapping Documentation repository

@ole4ryb ole4ryb changed the title Niad 3102 test dlq redelivery behaviour Niad-3102: test dlq redelivery behaviour Jun 24, 2024
@ole4ryb ole4ryb marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2024 09:56
@ole4ryb ole4ryb merged commit 419da52 into main Jun 25, 2024
1 check passed
@ole4ryb ole4ryb deleted the NIAD-3102-test-dlq-redelivery-behaviour branch June 25, 2024 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants