-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/rmh brca #67
Merged
+83
−11
Merged
Feature/rmh brca #67
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dcb7c09
Add Royal Marsden changes for test status=10
lauramccluskey1 de9fcdc
add unittests for royal marsden test status=10
lauramccluskey1 4167579
update non pathogenic variant changes
lauramccluskey1 5103d9b
update unittests for non pathogenic variant changes to royal marsden
lauramccluskey1 d00452f
make rubocop changes
lauramccluskey1 b84e69b
Merge develop branch into feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 80c9d2d
fix nil error
lauramccluskey1 6dc4265
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 6e70dc3
move process_teststatus after process_variant to prevent teststatus b…
lauramccluskey1 424346b
merge develop into branch feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 b0c614c
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 6e4bd38
Merge branch 'develop' into feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 1c81ce7
changes from code review and rubocop
lauramccluskey1 6e86452
merge develop into feature/RMH_brca
lauramccluskey1 a7f7fa0
correct spelling error
lauramccluskey1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can
raw_fields
be passed to thebuild_raw_record
method, eg:broken_record = build_raw_record('pseudo_id1' => 'bob', raw_fields: { 'teststatus' => 'Ex del' } )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestion @ollietulloch ! I have tried that and it doesn't work- I think its because build new record adds the test status field by loading the rawtext_clinical_json. So that needs to be loaded first then we can update the test status afterwards. Let me know if there is another way!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah ok, perhaps something for a future PR. It'd be nice for
build_raw_record
to be able to popluateraw_fields