Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revert "Update Dataset “geoglam.data”" #410

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024
Merged

Revert "Update Dataset “geoglam.data”" #410

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

j08lue
Copy link
Contributor

@j08lue j08lue commented Jun 24, 2024

Reverts #408

@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 24, 2024 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for visex ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 74345a2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/visex/deploys/66792ca8dd8f0d00086d583b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-410--visex.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

hanbyul-here
hanbyul-here approved these changes Jul 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@hanbyul-here hanbyul-here left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks good, and should be merged to staging.

@hanbyul-here hanbyul-here merged commit 509d5bf into develop Jul 17, 2024
6 checks passed
@hanbyul-here hanbyul-here deleted the revert-408-cms/dataset/geoglam.data branch July 17, 2024 20:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hanbyul-here hanbyul-here hanbyul-here approved these changes

@amarouane-ABDELHAK amarouane-ABDELHAK Awaiting requested review from amarouane-ABDELHAK

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@j08lue @hanbyul-here