Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MythTV 0.28-pre MAF Enhancement #16

Open
billmeek opened this issue Sep 16, 2013 · 5 comments
Open

MythTV 0.28-pre MAF Enhancement #16

billmeek opened this issue Sep 16, 2013 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@billmeek
Copy link
Contributor

Tracks adding v028 to the available ApiVersion enum and related code.

As of 9/16/2013, the 0.28-pre version of the backend reports the
following:

Library API : 0.27.20130911-1

I have seen no MythTV commits, so far that would suggest that
0.28-pre and 0.27 can't share the same code. I have seen talk
on the developers channel that suggest a change is upcoming.
I don't know the date.

@ghost ghost assigned tafypz Sep 16, 2013
@tafypz
Copy link
Member

tafypz commented Sep 16, 2013

After ServiceAPI 1.0 the code base doesn't expect any commonality between versions, when the change occurs I will generate the code for 0.28 from the wsdl and xsd data.

@billmeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tafypz, thanks for the response. In case you don't follow the MythTV
commits list, the version went to 0.28 today 9/18/2013.

commit af64614f308dc65570770200842f140267ef9844
Author: Stuart Morgan <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Sep 19 21:29:00 2013 +0100

    Bump ABI version following new gallery merge.

-#define MYTH_BINARY_VERSION "0.27.20130911-1"
+#define MYTH_BINARY_VERSION "0.28.20130919-1"

So, my tests are now using the 0.26 code, unless I revert
to a lower commit.

@tafypz
Copy link
Member

tafypz commented Sep 20, 2013

@billmeek after parsing the sources, only one change has happened which is the addition of the imageservice.
the other api endpoints remain unchanged.

I won't be able to do anything with it this week (need to create a separate 0.28 backend)
I will most likely have something towards the end of next week...

@billmeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tafypz, thanks for the info! With the new endpoints, there was a
Schema change from 1317 to 1318, so reverting to the 'pre image...'
changes isn't as easy as I thought (requires restoring the db from
a backup.)

@billmeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

billmeek commented Oct 4, 2013

Changed label to enhancement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants