Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add kwargs into insert method #2169 #2170
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add kwargs into insert method #2169 #2170
Changes from 2 commits
5268bf5
4460e51
68695ce
eaf65ca
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see a potential bug related to the following code (that is a bit below in this method):
In case you provide ordered=False and it raises an error (e.g if you try to insert 2 times a document with same pk), that piece of code won't be reached, leaving the mongoengine documents without id's. Instead of relying on
zip
to get the corresponding id, we could rely on theraw
dict that actually gets updated with the id by pymongo (see this post). Now since it will raise an error anyway, perhaps it could be acceptable to not set the id on the Documents instances. What do you think?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw in case of successful unordered insert, I'm also unsure if we could rely on zip , as I don't know if we can rely on the order of
inserted_result.inserted_ids