Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC introspector system integration #42

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jmikedupont2
Copy link

RFC: Mina Protocol Introspection and Verification Framework

Summary

This PR introduces an RFC for developing a comprehensive introspection and verification framework for the Mina Protocol. The proposed framework aims to enhance security, reliability, and code quality through formal verification, bug bounties, and continuous monitoring.

Motivation

As Mina continues to grow, ensuring the highest levels of security and reliability becomes increasingly crucial. This framework would provide:

  1. Formal verification tailored to Mina's unique architecture
  2. A structured bug bounty program
  3. Continuous monitoring and introspection

These elements combined would significantly boost confidence in the protocol and potentially catch critical issues early.

Proposal Highlights

  • Develop "Coq-of-Mina": A Coq-based formal verification framework
  • Implement a bug bounty program
  • Create "Mina Introspector": A continuous monitoring service
  • Establish funding mechanisms for ongoing development and maintenance

Current Progress

I'm currently working on extracting JSON representations from the Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) of the Mina codebase. This will serve as a foundation for the formal verification and introspection components of the framework.

Open Questions

  1. Which areas of the protocol should we prioritize for formal verification?
  2. How can we make the verification process more accessible to a broader range of developers?
  3. What metrics should we use to measure the success of the bug bounty program?
  4. How do we balance transparency in verification with potential security risks?
  5. What level of integration with existing Mina tools is necessary for optimal adoption?

Next Steps

  1. Gather community feedback on this RFC
  2. Refine the proposal based on discussions
  3. If approved, move forward with a detailed RFP for implementation

Feedback

I welcome all feedback, suggestions, and questions from the community. Please share your thoughts on this proposal and how we can improve it to best serve the Mina ecosystem.

Let's discuss!

@jmikedupont2 jmikedupont2 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 19, 2024 18:09
@jmikedupont2 jmikedupont2 changed the title Update and rename rfc-0001-standard-template.md to rfc-0010-meta-intr… RFC introspector system integration Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant