feat: Creating data tree for signed type V1 signatures

[jpuri]

Description

Adding data tree for typed sign V1 signature request.

Related issues

Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/MetaMask-planning/issues/3655

Manual testing steps

1. Enable mobile re-designs locally
2. Open test dapp and submit sign types v1 request
3. Check page that opens

Screenshots/Recordings

Screen.Recording.2024-11-21.at.7.46.00.PM.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

🔄🔄🔄 pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline started on Bitrise...🔄🔄🔄

Commit hash: 3c9f18d
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/b1f36715-1f40-46fc-a587-8d2e85e47134

Note

• This comment will auto-update when build completes
• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 4732bf2
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/e96cce90-df06-4678-b1ad-a740387b6b86

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.94737% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.93%. Comparing base (22a4989) to head (4732bf2).
Report is 36 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rmations/components/Confirm/DataTree/DataField.tsx	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ns/components/Confirm/Info/TypedSignV1/Message.tsx	71.42%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #12393      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.41%   56.93%   +0.52%     
==========================================
  Files        1797     1814      +17     
  Lines       40586    40871     +285     
  Branches     5097     5172      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits        22896    23271     +375     
+ Misses      16134    16023     -111     
- Partials     1556     1577      +21     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests
• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
83.3% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud