-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Force an update of the phishing warning configuration #20381
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
code looks good, will do a manual QA |
manual QA passes. I could repro the bug on v10.34.2, but not on this branch. I did the following:
|
danjm
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
pedronfigueiredo
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2023
The "last fetched" state for the `PhishingController` has been deleted to force an immediate full update of the phishing configuration state. We're doing this because the state was cleared in v10.34.2 because the format of that state had changed. This has been implemented in migration 92. The previous migration 92 has been renamed to 93 because it won't be included until a future release. We need the migrations to remain sequential, and this will save us from having to resolve a complex conflict when releasing this.
Gudahtt
force-pushed
the
force-phishing-config-refresh
branch
from
August 3, 2023 14:56
9a3bbc0
to
654ff8d
Compare
metamaskbot
added
the
release-10.36.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.36.0
label
Aug 3, 2023
Builds ready [654ff8d]
Page Load Metrics (1723 ± 97 ms)
Bundle size diffs [🚨 Warning! Bundle size has increased!]
|
Gudahtt
added
release-10.34.2
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.34.2
release-10.34.3
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.34.3
and removed
release-10.36.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.36.0
release-10.34.2
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.34.2
labels
Sep 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
release-10.34.3
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 10.34.3
team-extension-platform
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Explanation
The "last fetched" state for the
PhishingController
has been deleted to force an immediate full update of the phishing configuration state. We're doing this because the state was cleared in v10.34.2 because the format of that state had changed.This has been implemented in migration 92. The previous migration 92 has been renamed to 93 because it won't be included until a future release. We need the migrations to remain sequential, and this will save us from having to resolve a complex conflict when releasing this.
Manual Testing Steps
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist
If further QA is required (e.g. new feature, complex testing steps, large refactor), add the
Extension QA Board
label.In this case, a QA Engineer approval will be be required.