Flaky Test: "Import ERC1155 NFT should be able to import an ERC1155 NFT that user owns" #24604
Closed
9 tasks
Assignees
Labels
flaky tests
release-11.16.1
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 11.16.1
release-12.0.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.0.0
team-extension-platform
Comments
7 tasks
seaona
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 22, 2024
…ERC1155 NFT that user owns` (#24709) ## **Description** This PR fixes the flaky tests related to ERC1155 token imports. The problem is that whenever we import a token, we are making a call to IPFS, which was currently not mocked. This caused that anytime that the response took long, the test failed. The fix is simply add a mock for the IPFS request. However, this shows that we have a bug in the Import process, as we should be able to import the token even if the IPFS call has not ended. Now, it might take several minutes, and we can import the token once we get the timeout response `504`. I opened an issue [here](#24710) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #24604 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Run the test multiple times `yarn test:e2e:single test/e2e/tests/tokens/nft/import-erc1155.spec.js --browser=firefox --leave-running --retryUntilFailure --retries=10` 2. Check ci ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/assets/54408225/a397575b-52a9-47d7-8243-c0fec734e6d8 ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
58 tasks
dbrans
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 28, 2024
…ERC1155 NFT that user owns` (#24709) ## **Description** This PR fixes the flaky tests related to ERC1155 token imports. The problem is that whenever we import a token, we are making a call to IPFS, which was currently not mocked. This caused that anytime that the response took long, the test failed. The fix is simply add a mock for the IPFS request. However, this shows that we have a bug in the Import process, as we should be able to import the token even if the IPFS call has not ended. Now, it might take several minutes, and we can import the token once we get the timeout response `504`. I opened an issue [here](#24710) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #24604 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Run the test multiple times `yarn test:e2e:single test/e2e/tests/tokens/nft/import-erc1155.spec.js --browser=firefox --leave-running --retryUntilFailure --retries=10` 2. Check ci ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/assets/54408225/a397575b-52a9-47d7-8243-c0fec734e6d8 ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
metamaskbot
added
the
release-11.16.1
|
Missing release label release-11.16.1 on issue. Adding release label release-11.16.1 on issue, as issue is linked to PR #24709 which has this release label. |
gauthierpetetin
added
the
release-12.0.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What is this about?
Failure:
https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/MetaMask/metamask-extension/81132/workflows/76b59ca6-3a4d-4273-84a9-38283f2d2754/jobs/2874086/tests
Error message
Screenshot
Scenario
No response
Design
No response
Technical Details
No response
Threat Modeling Framework
No response
Acceptance Criteria
No response
Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged
References
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: