Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 136.0.0 #4153

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Release 136.0.0 #4153

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

NicholasEllul
Copy link
Contributor

@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul commented Apr 11, 2024

Explanation

Releases version 9.1.0 of the @metamask/controller-utils package.

@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul requested review from a team as code owners April 11, 2024 17:03
@NicholasEllul
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MetaMask/shared-libraries-engineers just wanted to flag 181a868

It looks like the yarn create-release-branch had all the URL's contain /core.git/ instead of /core/ - might be something to keep an eye out for.

@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul marked this pull request as draft April 12, 2024 16:44
@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul marked this pull request as ready for review April 12, 2024 17:01
@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul requested a review from Gudahtt April 12, 2024 18:38
Copy link
Member

@Gudahtt Gudahtt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul merged commit 34542cf into main Apr 12, 2024
139 checks passed
@NicholasEllul NicholasEllul deleted the release/136.0.0 branch April 12, 2024 18:43
digiwand added a commit to MetaMask/metamask-extension that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2024
#24138)

## **Description**

Resolves @spruceid/siwe-parser 1.1.3 → 2.1.0 The updated
@spruceid/siwe-parser allows `http` and `https` schemas in a transaction
message's URL.

Additional changes are included in the @spruceid/siwe-parser upgrade
from v1.1.3 → v2.1.0. One important update is the requirement of
[EIP-55](https://npmfs.com/package/@spruceid/siwe-parser/1.1.3/lib/abnf.ts)
complaint addresses. This means that if a dapp attempts to sign a
`personal_sign` message with a from address that is not EIP-55
compliant, SIWE will not be detected. This is what we want as
[EIP-4361](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4361) enforces EIP-55
addresses. There's a separate ticket that'll warn users if a
`personal_sign` message looks like a SIWE but doesn't parse to a SIWE
message: #24128

Issue to update test-dapp SIWE addresses to be EIP-55 complaint:
MetaMask/test-dapp#326

Related Links (Thanks @NicholasEllul for these): 
- https://app.warp.dev/block/4eE6QC12lVuwARbpFj62VJ 
- https://npmfs.com/package/@spruceid/siwe-parser/1.1.3/lib/abnf.ts

## **Related issues**

Fixes: MetaMask/MetaMask-planning#2256
Relates To: MetaMask/MetaMask-planning#2278

Related to: #24107
Related to: MetaMask/core#4153
Related to: MetaMask/core#4141

## **Manual testing steps**

1. Go to the metamask test-dapp or run the test-dapp locally
2. When testing locally, optionally update the from addresses used by
the buttons
3. Test Sign-in With Ethereum buttons
4. Observe MM


## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->

### **Before**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

### **After**

<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->

## **Pre-merge author checklist**

- [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable
- [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

---------

Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: legobeat <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nicholas Ellul <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants