Skip to content

Fix script due to misclassification of implicit arg as potential type… #2724

Fix script due to misclassification of implicit arg as potential type…

Fix script due to misclassification of implicit arg as potential type… #2724

Triggered via push March 18, 2024 10:34
Status Success
Total duration 34m 18s
Artifacts

build.yml

on: push
checktodos
3s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

40 warnings
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Could not enable unknown warning notation_overridden
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Could not enable unknown warning notation_overridden
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Could not enable unknown warning notation_overridden
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
adj is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected inside
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
is_adjoint' is declared opaque (Qed) but this is not fully respected
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Could not enable unknown warning notation_overridden
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ { _ := _ }" was already used.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.18, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.