Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport 2.28: Correct styling of Mbed TLS in documentation #8324

Conversation

tom-daubney-arm
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Several bits of documentation were incorrectly styling Mbed TLS as MbedTLS.

PR checklist

Please tick as appropriate and edit the reasons (e.g.: "backport: not needed because this is a new feature")

  • changelog not required
  • backport done
  • tests not required

Notes for the submitter

Please refer to the contributing guidelines, especially the
checklist for PR contributors.

Several bits of documentation were incorrectly styling Mbed TLS
as MbedTLS.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Daubney <[email protected]>
@tom-daubney-arm tom-daubney-arm added bug needs-ci Needs to pass CI tests component-docs Docs / website issues filed here for tracking single-reviewer This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer priority-medium Medium priority - this can be reviewed as time permits size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most) labels Oct 6, 2023
@tom-daubney-arm tom-daubney-arm changed the title Bacport 2.28: Correct styling of Mbed TLS in documentation Backport 2.28: Correct styling of Mbed TLS in documentation Oct 6, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@davidhorstmann-arm davidhorstmann-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@davidhorstmann-arm davidhorstmann-arm added the approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports label Oct 6, 2023
@daverodgman daverodgman added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 6, 2023
Merged via the queue into Mbed-TLS:mbedtls-2.28 with commit e0be6bf Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports bug component-docs Docs / website issues filed here for tracking needs-ci Needs to pass CI tests priority-medium Medium priority - this can be reviewed as time permits single-reviewer This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants