Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.28] Remove all travis builds except for coverity_scan #8245

Conversation

paul-elliott-arm
Copy link
Member

@paul-elliott-arm paul-elliott-arm commented Sep 22, 2023

Description

Remove all travis builds except for the coverity_scan push. This needs to be done prior to our paid plan expiring at the end of the month.

Backport of #8244

PR checklist

Please tick as appropriate and edit the reasons (e.g.: "backport: not needed because this is a new feature")

  • changelog provided, or not required (not a code change)
  • backport done, or not required (this is the backport)
  • tests provided, or not required (not a code change)

@paul-elliott-arm paul-elliott-arm self-assigned this Sep 22, 2023
@paul-elliott-arm paul-elliott-arm added needs-review Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members, needs-reviewer This PR needs someone to pick it up for review single-reviewer This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer component-test Test framework and CI scripts priority-very-high Highest priority - prioritise this over other review work size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most) labels Sep 22, 2023
@paul-elliott-arm paul-elliott-arm changed the title Remove all travis builds except for coverity_scan [Backport 2.28] Remove all travis builds except for coverity_scan Sep 22, 2023
@tom-daubney-arm tom-daubney-arm self-requested a review September 22, 2023 17:42
@tom-daubney-arm tom-daubney-arm removed the needs-reviewer This PR needs someone to pick it up for review label Sep 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@tom-daubney-arm tom-daubney-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Faithful backport. LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm added approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports and removed needs-review Every commit must be reviewed by at least two team members, labels Sep 22, 2023
@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 22, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 22, 2023
@gilles-peskine-arm
Copy link
Contributor

The CI failed in the merge queue in build_armcc:

  CC    pkcs5.c
Internal fault: [0x87ecef:5060300] in mbedtls_error_add

Whatever caused that, it doesn't seem to be reproducible, and it can't be related to this pull request which only changed the Travis configuration. So I'm going ahead and merging without going through the merge queue.

@gilles-peskine-arm gilles-peskine-arm merged commit b53e630 into Mbed-TLS:mbedtls-2.28 Sep 24, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Design and code approved - may be waiting for CI or backports component-test Test framework and CI scripts priority-very-high Highest priority - prioritise this over other review work single-reviewer This PR qualifies for having only one reviewer size-xs Estimated task size: extra small (a few hours at most)
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants