Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to v5.42.1 #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2022

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 8, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin 5.42.0 -> 5.42.1 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser 5.42.0 -> 5.42.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v5.42.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v5.42.1

Compare Source

Note: Version bump only for package @​typescript-eslint/parser


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@Keith-CY
Copy link
Member

Keith-CY commented Nov 8, 2022

This update only affects development experience and has nothing to do with functions

@Keith-CY Keith-CY merged commit 431ed82 into develop Nov 8, 2022
@Keith-CY Keith-CY deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch November 8, 2022 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants