Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update aws-sdk-rails 3.8.0 → 3.9.0 (minor) #1234

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Sep 29, 2023

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ aws-sdk-rails (3.8.0 → 3.9.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.9.0

Tag release v3.9.0

References: #102, #103, #104

  • Feature - Add support for selectively choosing deduplication keys.

  • Feature - Set required Ruby version to >= 2.3 (#104)

  • Issue - Run rubocop on all files. (#104)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 11 commits:

↗️ aws-partitions (indirect, 1.826.0 → 1.830.0) · Repo

Sorry, we couldn't find anything useful about this release.

↗️ aws-record (indirect, 2.11.0 → 2.12.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.12.0

Tag release v2.12.0

References: #112, #133, #134, #135, #136

  • Feature - Allow put, update, and delete item options to be passed through to
    the underlying client calls.

  • Feature - Add an original_error accessor to Errors::ConditionalWriteFailed
    which contains the Aws::DynamoDB::Errors::ConditionalCheckFailedException
    error. If :return_values_on_condition_check_failure was provided to a put,
    update, or delete item call, this error will contain the item data that failed
    the condition check.

  • Issue - Fix default value for String/Numeric Sets to be unset. (#133)

  • Feature - Set required Ruby version to >= 2.3 (#134)

  • Issue - Run Rubocop on all files. (#135)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 19 commits:

↗️ aws-sdk-core (indirect, 3.183.0 → 3.184.0) · Repo · Changelog

↗️ aws-sdk-dynamodb (indirect, 1.93.1 → 1.95.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.95.0 (from changelog)

  • Feature - Code Generated Changes, see ./build_tools or aws-sdk-core's CHANGELOG.md for details.

  • Feature - Simple attributes conversion for item data returned in ConditionalCheckFailedException and other exceptions. (Breaking change / bug fix)

1.94.0 (from changelog)

  • Feature - Amazon DynamoDB now supports Incremental Export as an enhancement to the existing Export Table

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

↗️ aws-sdk-ses (indirect, 1.55.0 → 1.56.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.56.0 (from changelog)

  • Feature - Code Generated Changes, see ./build_tools or aws-sdk-core's CHANGELOG.md for details.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

↗️ aws-sdk-sesv2 (indirect, 1.39.0 → 1.40.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.40.0 (from changelog)

  • Feature - Code Generated Changes, see ./build_tools or aws-sdk-core's CHANGELOG.md for details.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

↗️ aws-sdk-sqs (indirect, 1.62.0 → 1.63.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.63.0

References: #692

  • Feature - Aws::CloudFront - Added support for the 2014-11-06 API version.
  • Feature - Aws::IAM - Added support for managed policies.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

↗️ zeitwerk (indirect, 2.6.11 → 2.6.12) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

2.6.12 (from changelog)

  • Maintenance release with some internal polishing.

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 7 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Sep 29, 2023
@mitlib mitlib temporarily deployed to thesis-submit-pr-1234 September 29, 2023 22:16 Inactive
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 98.352%. remained the same when pulling c33d095 on depfu/update/aws-sdk-rails-3.9.0 into 50d597e on main.

Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Dec 20, 2023

Closed in favor of #1259.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Dec 20, 2023
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/aws-sdk-rails-3.9.0 branch December 20, 2023 19:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants