Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation to highlight situations or studies where multi-echo or tedana are specifically useful #520

Open
handwerkerd opened this issue Jan 9, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
documentation issues related to improving documentation for the project good first issue issues that we think are good for new contributors. Equivalent to "very low" effort.

Comments

@handwerkerd
Copy link
Member

Summary

Several developers discussed adding a section to the documentation that highlights situations or specific studies that demonstrate where multi-echo fMRI in general or specific methods have been shown to be useful. This could be a either a "case studies" or "killer apps" section.

Additional Detail

I've open this issue as a place for people to suggest content that could go into this section until someone actually turns this content into a cohesive section of the documentation.

Next Steps

  • Suggest case studies or papers that exist
  • Suggest things that where we known multi-echo fMRI can help or thing it can help, but where you don't know of any validation studies yet.
  • Compile all this info into a new section of the documentation.
@handwerkerd
Copy link
Member Author

handwerkerd commented Jan 9, 2020

Just to get some case examples started:

  • Long task designs
    Separating slow BOLD from non-BOLD baseline drifts using multi-echo fMRI
    10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.051
    Can potentially distinguish slow drifts from scanner noise from slows drifts that are central to neuropharmacology or learning studies.
  • Reducing dropout in ventral regions
    Making cardiac gated fMRI more realistic
    Evaluation of multi-echo ICA denoising for task based fMRI studies: Block designs, rapid event-related designs, and cardiac-gated fMRI
    10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.049
    Benefits of multi-echo fMRI for brain-stem imaging and with cardiac gated fMRI.
  • Paradigm free mapping methods
    Quantitative Deconvolution of fMRI Data with Multi-echo Sparse Paradigm Free Mapping
    10.1007/978-3-030-00931-1_36
    Multi-echo information helps a sparse deconvolution method become more reliable
  • TSNR or CNR boosts
    8-10% boost in contrast to noise across a massively repeated task just with the optimal combination of echos and more with denoising.
    https://fim.nimh.nih.gov/presentations/effects-multi-echo-based-denoising-reliability-massively-repeated-block-design-task & https://fim.nimh.nih.gov/presentations/effect-multi-echo-denoising-amount-data-required-see-wide-spread-activity
  • Non-aggressive paradigms can be accelerated slightly (or perhaps not at all) to get SNR boost from echo combination
  • Something with task correlated motion, in which pure motion regressors could be harmful.

@handwerkerd handwerkerd added documentation issues related to improving documentation for the project good first issue issues that we think are good for new contributors. Equivalent to "very low" effort. labels Jan 9, 2020
@benoitberanger
Copy link
Contributor

The quest for the best: The impact of different EPI sequences on the
sensitivity of random effect fMRI group analyses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.071

In the Conclusion :

We note activation studies of the orbitofrontal cortex affected by susceptibility artifacts as an important exception, since multi-echo EPI provides superior sensitivity as compared to their single echo counterparts.

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Feb 11, 2020

@handwerkerd should we include uses of multi-echo combined with other things, like physio or phase data?

@dowdlelt
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm not sure where to file something like this, but this paper is interesting in using ultra high res, 7T multiecho fmri as means to examine layer profiles.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053811911001984?via%3Dihub
One interesting finding for me was that different layers have different optimal echo times, and this can be related to myeline content.

@tsalo tsalo changed the title Documentation to highlight situations or studies were multi-echo or tedana are specifically useful Documentation to highlight situations or studies where multi-echo or tedana are specifically useful Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation issues related to improving documentation for the project good first issue issues that we think are good for new contributors. Equivalent to "very low" effort.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants