-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 663
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use physical units in AtomGroup objects. #596
Comments
The easiest way would be to copy the unit dict from the reader somewhere accessible from the universe. Yet, this dict could contain unit objects rather than strings. |
We could then also clean up the hacks in |
We've got a nice system of Attribute or Timestep holding all data now, and On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 02:17 Oliver Beckstein [email protected] wrote:
|
Also worth noting that facilitating third-party dtype specification is on the NumPy roadmap so if there is specific feedback re: things that MDA needs to make this easier I can relay that information. Be able to write the dtype in pure Python is on the roadmap, albeit somewhat ambitious for more useful dtypes. |
There's been a comment on the mailing list that it would be nice to have units attached to the Atomgroup objects.
I think that is a great idea. We can have a look into one of the many packages that provide unit aware numpy arrays.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: