We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
neighbor search with capped_distance returns reliable and consistent results
It doesn't.
capped_distance()
FastNS
See #2229 (comment) for detailed analysis of problems.
Disable nsgrid-based neighbor search until we have a stable solution. Use PBC-pkdtree instead.
See linked issues.
python -c "import MDAnalysis as mda; print(mda.__version__)"
python -V
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm working on a quick fix for this given the discussion in #2768
Do we want to solely remove nsgrid from 1.0.1 (i.e. only target master), or do we want to do so for develop too?
master
develop
Sorry, something went wrong.
Temporarily disable nsgrid (Issue MDAnalysis#2930)
ce11aeb
Temporarily disable nsgrid (Issue #2930) (#3004)
6e2d8e7
Fixes #2930 - Temporarily replaces nsgrid with pkdtree - Adds note on the use of nsgrid
Closed in #3004.
No branches or pull requests
Expected behavior
neighbor search with capped_distance returns reliable and consistent results
Actual behavior
It doesn't.
capped_distance()
with "nsgrid" search and atom in the center of the box #2919FastNS
yields wrong results on simple test case #2345See #2229 (comment) for detailed analysis of problems.
Course of action
Disable nsgrid-based neighbor search until we have a stable solution. Use PBC-pkdtree instead.
Impact
Code to reproduce the behavior
See linked issues.
Current version of MDAnalysis
python -c "import MDAnalysis as mda; print(mda.__version__)"
) 1.0.x, 2.0.0-devpython -V
)? anyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: