Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add Molecular Nodes/MDAnalysis to hackathon #12

Open
orbeckst opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 13 comments
Open

add Molecular Nodes/MDAnalysis to hackathon #12

orbeckst opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 13 comments
Assignees

Comments

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

@yuxuanzhuang started planning the Molecular Nodes/MDAnalysis Blender hackathon session in discord: #project-proposals: MDA/MN Collaboration

I've compiled some of my thoughts on MN hackathon session (get password from @yuxuanzhuang or discord thread) :

We will be conducting the session from 10:00 to 15:00 WEST on September 29th. @BradyAJohnston are welcome to chip in but I do understand if you can't participate for the entire duration.

Currently, I think there are several potential goals to consider:

  • Working on an optimal API
  • Improving the code's performance.
  • Creating a prototype to visualize analysis results.
  • Better timeline management.
  • Select atoms within Blender (which may require an advanced level of Blender knowledge).

Add necessary materials to the hackathon/blender directory. You can also rename it from blender to MolecularNodes but then you need to change links in README.md file(s).

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

Quick note for working on this repository: If you are just touching files in the blender directory or do minor fixes in the READMEs then you don't need to wait for a review. Just make your changes. If you're modifying someone else's stuff, do a PR + wait for a review (just ping someone like @fiona-naughton (who is in charge of hackathon things) @jennaswa (for overall organizational things) @orbeckst (if you just need someone quickly) or ask on discord).

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

In your outline I saw that you're also preparing a video for participants to watch in advance to get set up. I think that's a great idea. Can you raise a separate issue for that?

We would just put videos up on YouTube in the (very tiny) MDAnalysis channel.

@BradyAJohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

@orbeckst could I get write access to put some info into the blender README?

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

@BradyAJohnston I added you to the repo with write access.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Sep 23, 2023

@yuxuanzhuang we are planning to send out instructions to attendees on Monday - are there any further changes you wish to make ahead of this?

@yuxuanzhuang
Copy link
Collaborator

just waiting for the YouTube link and I think it's good to go!

@BradyAJohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

I've added some more notes on explaining data flow, and will add some more in the next day or two as well, will hopefully help people get started interfacing with Blender.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Sep 24, 2023

@BradyAJohnston - for the sake of ensuring we don't have things go out of synch across multiple editors, could you please commit via PR rather than directly to the main branch?

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

@IAlibay just fyi when we started work on the repo I gave the guideline above #12 (comment) to make sure things were moving along quickly.

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Sep 24, 2023

@orbeckst that's fair, sorry I didn't see that. However, given how close we are to the UGM, could we reconsider this policy?

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

orbeckst commented Sep 24, 2023 via email

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

IAlibay commented Sep 24, 2023 via email

@BradyAJohnston
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep apologies @IAlibay was following earlier instructions, will ensure it goes via PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants