-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add DCGAN module #403
Add DCGAN module #403
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #403 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.49% 79.46% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 102 104 +2
Lines 5912 6047 +135
==========================================
+ Hits 4700 4805 +105
- Misses 1212 1242 +30
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
The tests fail because CIFAR10 fails to download. Is it possible to cache it? Also: is it possible to deactivate some of the tests in the beginning? It feels quite resource-draining. And why does codefactor check a file that I haven't changed ( |
@chris-clem Thank you for your contribution!
Actually, we've recently enabled dataset caching in #315, but it seems it is not working properly as you point out... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also please make sure to add the summary of your change to CHANGELOG.md
:]
* Upgrade DQN to use .log * remove unused * pep8 * fixed other dqn
* Decouple dms from CPCV2 * Update tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thank you for your swift action!
Was it wrong to rebase?
Thanks, happy to contribute! |
I believe it's fine. Let me know if there is something that concerns you :] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chris-clem Could you also add DCGAN to the docs like GAN? https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning-bolts/blob/master/docs/source/gans.rst
Sorry for the delay. I get access to a GPU server in a couple of days and will train a model there. |
…verse#344) * bugfix: batch_size for DataModules remaining * Update sklearn datamodule tests * Fix default_transforms. Keep internal for every data module * fix typo on binary_mnist_datamodule thanks @akihironitta Co-authored-by: Akihiro Nitta <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Akihiro Nitta <[email protected]>
@akihironitta Here also the ubuntu and mac python 3.6 tests fail. |
@chris-clem same cause #471. Taking a look. |
@chris-clem Thank you for quickly applying the suggestion. As @ananyahjha93 mentioned, the other failures in the tests have been reported in #471. |
@chris-clem rebase and resolve conflicts, good to go! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@chris-clem Would you mind resolving the conflict and applying |
@akihironitta Done :)! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chris-clem Thank you for your swift action!
@chris-clem @akihironitta can you pls resolve conflicts (rebase) so we can get it land... |
@Borda I don't see any conflicts at the moment and I added yapf yesterday. The yapf tests passes. Am I missing something else? |
@chris-clem the conflicts appeared when I tried to rebase it so we test it out with newly added py 3.8 |
What does this PR do?
As proposed in #401, this PR adds a DCGAN implementation closely following the one in PyTorch's examples (https://github.com/pytorch/examples/blob/master/dcgan/main.py).
Fixes #401
Before submitting
PR review
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.
Did you have fun?
Make sure you had fun coding 🙃