Average blob throughput over 9m window #667
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9m seems like the best window to use between 10min->30d time ranges for smoothing out the 10m batch interval spikes See https://eigenda.grafana.net/d/bdssk3vbvt69sd/blob-explorer-query?orgId=1&from=1721922790524&to=1721965990524
teddyknox
approved these changes
Jul 29, 2024
|
Preprod |
|
Testnet Before Testnet After |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
9m seems like the best window to use between 10min->30d time ranges for smoothing out the 10m batch interval spikes See https://eigenda.grafana.net/d/bdssk3vbvt69sd/blob-explorer-query?orgId=1&from=1721922790524&to=1721965990524
raw rate vs 9m
9m vs 10m
24hr
1hr
1hr (9m vs 10m)
Why are these changes needed?
Checks