You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Probably we can create an additional type for the root field (where order argument is defined) that will contain fields and extra operators. It will also allow to have property field with all fields and avoid name conflicts (current version will throw an error if the field with the same name as extra operator exists).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LastDragon-ru
changed the title
Extra operators should be available only on top level (@sortBy)
Extra operators should be available only on top level only (@sortBy)
Jan 11, 2024
LastDragon-ru
changed the title
Extra operators should be available only on top level only (@sortBy)
Extra operators should be available on top level only (@sortBy)
Jan 11, 2024
Makes no sense to have
Probably we can create an additional type for the root field (where
order
argument is defined) that will contain fields and extra operators. It will also allow to haveproperty
field with all fields and avoid name conflicts (current version will throw an error if the field with the same name as extra operator exists).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: