You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thx for impressive work and code. So, after checking the inference code under the case conditioned by an image, the whole generation just degenerates into a SSL representation conditioned MAGE. Is my understanding true? If yes, does it mean RDM is not used during inference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your interest! For Figure 6 and 7 in the paper (which corresponds to the case conditioned by ground-truth images), the RDM is NOT needed because the SSL representation is provided by ground-truth image. However, we note that such a case has a strong limitation in practice, as typically we don't have ground-truth images when we want to generate an image. Therefore, we need the RDM to generate the SSL representations under common generation scenarios where we don't have ground-truth images
Got it! I agree with generating images conditioned by GT seems to be useless. I was just wondering where does RDM go in viewing your code. Plus, thx for so quick reply, what a dedicated author you are. hhhh
Thx for impressive work and code. So, after checking the inference code under the case conditioned by an image, the whole generation just degenerates into a SSL representation conditioned MAGE. Is my understanding true? If yes, does it mean RDM is not used during inference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: