Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fits are unstable #33

Open
mfisherlevine opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Fits are unstable #33

mfisherlevine opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@mfisherlevine
Copy link
Collaborator

As shown by the variable results in issue 32, fits are quite unstable.

At most stages, despite being seeded randomly (at time of issue-filing == d568533) the intermediate results are identical to the displayed precision when displayed with --verbose (e.g. 300.23339285427346, which is lots), but the final result is not, so something is not right.

Fixing issue 32 will fix this for some cases, of course, but will simply cement others into a bad part of the phase space, depending on the seed and the input data, so this is a different issue entirely.

Warnings showing this include outputs such as Minimum chisq is on the edge of the exploration grid. as well as being evidenced by getting different results from the same input.

jeremyneveu pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2023
DM-38403: Add check that necessary calspec file is able to be obtained
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant