-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pass wavelengths to color calculations #135
Comments
Do you need to run this by Jacob or Charlie to verify the correct procedure
? Just curious.
…On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:34 AM Simon Vidanovic ***@***.***> wrote:
Make sure to pass wavelength to color calculation since that is consistent
with rest of the methods. Now, color calculations are using wavelenghts
from the materials which does not sound correct.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#135>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQFXRQOYFWU3B62QO7U7YLVZZQ2VANCNFSM565Z3QNQ>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Robin Mitchell
Building Technology and Urban Systems Division
Energy Technologies Area
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
|
Gang,
I think Simon is doing the right thing.
I reviewed ASTM E308 and it allows for calculation of
data not obtained at 5nm intervals but it is quite
cumbersome (it looks like you have to use different
illuminant and detector spectra rather than just using
the data in the 5nm spectra where you have sample data).
It is also restrictive in that it has to be 10 nm or
20 nm steps, not a mix, and no other step size, so our old
wavelength definition is not allowed (the one with 121
wavelengths used in clear_3.dat e.g.).
This is how it was set up in W5_NFRC_2003.std:
Wavelength Set : Color 5nm.wvl
It makes sense to me as it is technically better
than the standard (doing interpolation of data to
the high resolution illuminant and detector spectra
instead of using other tables for low res data).
Best,
Jacob
…On 10/11/2022 2:00 AM, RDmitchell wrote:
Do you need to run this by Jacob or Charlie to verify the correct procedure
? Just curious.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:34 AM Simon Vidanovic ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Make sure to pass wavelength to color calculation since that is
consistent
> with rest of the methods. Now, color calculations are using wavelenghts
> from the materials which does not sound correct.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#135>, or
> unsubscribe
>
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQFXRQOYFWU3B62QO7U7YLVZZQ2VANCNFSM565Z3QNQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
> ID: ***@***.***>
>
--
Robin Mitchell
Building Technology and Urban Systems Division
Energy Technologies Area
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#135 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE3LUUJA44J2S47OSI3JV6TWCUUBDANCNFSM565Z3QNQ>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
@RDmitchell This is just a notification for me to check if wavelengths used in color procedures are passed correctly. I stumble into this while optimizing code recently and it is good to check. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Make sure to pass wavelength to color calculation since that is consistent with rest of the methods. Now, color calculations are using wavelenghts from the materials which does not sound correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: